Historic Map Overlays in Google Maps

Technology makes it fun these days to compare maps of the past with their modern-day equivalents to learn just where the nearest cemetery or church may have been or why your ancestors went to the next county to record their familys deeds and vital events. Historical overlay maps, which have been available for Google Maps and Google Earth  since 2006, make this type of cartographic research very fun and easy.  The premise behind a historic overlay map is that it can be layered directly on top of current road maps and/or satellite images. By adjusting the transparency of the historic maps, you can see through to the modern-day map behind to compare the similarities and differences between old and new maps, and study the changes in your selected location over time. A great tool for genealogists! Hundreds, and more likely thousands, of organizations, developers, and even individuals have created historic overlap maps for the online tool Google Maps (nice for people who dont want to download the Google Earth software). 120 historical maps from the David Rumsey Map Collection, for example, were integrated into Google Maps last year. Additional historic map overlays you might want to explore include  North Carolina Historic Overlay Maps,  Scotland Historical Map Overlays,  Henry Hudson 400  and  Greater Philadelphia GeoHistory Network. If you really love these historic overlay maps, you may want to download the free Google Earth software. There are many more historic map overlays available through Google Earth, than through Google Maps, including many posted directly by Google. You can find the historical maps in the sidebar section titled layers.

Literacy Rate Of Low Enrollment - 1973 Words

In past years, Illiteracy was a big issue to some countries like Pakistan, Ghana Ethiopia, South Africa and other places in Africa. Over the past years, the government of these countries focused on education. The levels of literacy in these countries was too high and there were causes of negative impact toward education. For instance, literacy rate of girls in Pakistan and family were the negative impact. Literacy rates for both gender was too high in Ghana, Ethiopia and South Africa and the negative impact was poverty. The government want to reduce literacy by doing many things. For example, the high rate of low enrollment for girls in Pakistan, In South Africa there was a program called the Emotional Literacy and Persona Doll program,†¦show more content†¦(Latif Amna.) In addition, in Ghana money was the most negative impact towards the high literacy rate. Ghana was poor country in past years, so, the Government were trying to do the past to improve education. One of the problems was the low salary of teachers and this all because of the money. (Blunch, Niels-Hugo) Children in South Africa were faced with many difficult things in their lives. Years ago in South Africa teacher teach the student in a library rather than schools. In 1994, most of the students did not go to the school, students just go to the library to study and workshop with their teachers during the literacy project. Children in elementary schools drop out because family pressure. Some families began to send their children to enroll in drama schools rather than general schools because of low fee. Also, some students said we shall now focus on the drama workshops because they feel that drama schools worth it, and the tuition of the drama schools were not that expensive. The article indicated some good reasons to enroll in a drama school were the low fee and children were learning from the school. Some people indicated that drama workshops were the solution to the linking of literac y. South Africa s young children faced many emotional problems, and there were a lot of things that increased literacy in South Africa such as, the poverty, so it was hard for children to develop their skills with all these

Individuals vs Society Theme in Romeo and Juliet Essay Example For Students

Individuals vs Society Theme in Romeo and Juliet Essay In the age of Rome and Juliets creation, many values of society were different from those we can observe in modern day life. Women did not have equal rights, fathers had a lot more authority over their children and arranged marriages were still practiced. A big factor was peoples Christian faith; it was much stronger in those days so the church played a huge role in society. There are lots of factors that contribute to the outcome of the play and these can be separated into Generic factors and society and values. In modern families, parents tend to have control over the household. They do not force the children to marry or force their life decisions upon them but they have a subtle yet firm grasp on their childrens lives. They use this grasp to guide, not to force their children. However, in the time of Romeo and Juliet, the parents had control over the household, the father more so than the mother. They would tell their children how to live. We see evidence of this in Act III Scene v when Capulet discusses marriage with Juliet. He is very upset to hear that she does not want to go through with her arranged marriage. Capulet: Hang thee young baggage, disobedient wretch! I tell thee what: get thee to church a Thursday, Or never after look me in the face Wife, we scarce thought us blest That God had lent us but this only child, But now I see this one is one too much, And that we have a curse in having her. Out on her, hilding! This seems like a very drastic reaction but it shows how much control a father considered himself to have, and just how important he considered it to be. This kind of controlling behaviour added greatly to the tragedy in the end. The honour of the family name was of great importance during the time of the play. It represented your history and heritage, who you were and your position in society. A person would go to great lengths to uphold the honour in their name, especially Tybalt. The Montagues and the Capulets were both high up in the social hierarchy, as is stated in the prologue Two households, both alike in dignity. They had a lot to defend but they entangled in an ancient grudge. They had had a small argument with each other and this had become very serious by the time Romeo and Juliet had met. The play begins with the two families brawling in the streets and the prince then says If ever you disturb our streets again, Your lives shall pay the forfeit of the peace. A fight breaks out in Act III Sc i, which results in the deaths of Tybalt and Mercutio. There was a cascade of events leading to this. Romeo and his friends had sneaked into the Capulets party, Tybalt saw Romeo there and wanted to fight him, but his uncle told him off, He shall be endured Tybalt was angry with Romeo after this for making a mockery of his family and for getting him into trouble with his uncle. He wanted to fight him even more. This was after Romeo has married Juliet, so Tybalt does not know that Romeo was honouring his wife by not fighting a member of her family. Romeo says Tybalt, the reason that I have to love thee Doth much excuse the appertaining rage to such a greeting Tybalt replies Boy, this shall not excuse the injuries thou hast done me, therefore turn and draw. Mercutio feels that this threat to Romeo is unacceptable and challenges Tybalt, O calm, dishonourable, vile submission! After Mercutio defends Romeo and fights Tybalt, Mercutio is killed. Out of loyal ty to his friend and anger, Romeo kills Tybalt to avenge Mercutios death. .u109e8024efd7fabee4d8048c3216ea95 , .u109e8024efd7fabee4d8048c3216ea95 .postImageUrl , .u109e8024efd7fabee4d8048c3216ea95 .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .u109e8024efd7fabee4d8048c3216ea95 , .u109e8024efd7fabee4d8048c3216ea95:hover , .u109e8024efd7fabee4d8048c3216ea95:visited , .u109e8024efd7fabee4d8048c3216ea95:active { border:0!important; } .u109e8024efd7fabee4d8048c3216ea95 .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .u109e8024efd7fabee4d8048c3216ea95 { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .u109e8024efd7fabee4d8048c3216ea95:active , .u109e8024efd7fabee4d8048c3216ea95:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .u109e8024efd7fabee4d8048c3216ea95 .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .u109e8024efd7fabee4d8048c3216ea95 .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .u109e8024efd7fabee4d8048c3216ea95 .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .u109e8024efd7fabee4d8048c3216ea95 .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .u109e8024efd7fabee4d8048c3216ea95:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .u109e8024efd7fabee4d8048c3216ea95 .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .u109e8024efd7fabee4d8048c3216ea95 .u109e8024efd7fabee4d8048c3216ea95-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .u109e8024efd7fabee4d8048c3216ea95:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Charles Dickens essay - Oliver TwistPerhaps if family honour had not been so serious, Mercutio and Tybalt would have lived and also Romeo and Juliet could have marred each other. Also, if these events had not taken place, Juliets arranged marriage would not have been pushed forward by her father. Before these events Lord Capulet said that she was too young. We see several different types of loyalty which contribute to the outcome, Romeos loyalty to his wife, Tybalts loyalty to his family and Mercutios loyalty to his friend. In Act I Scene ii Romeo meets Capulets servant. The servant had been given the guest list of the party and has been told to find all the people on it, only he couldnt read. He needed to find out who they were, so he asked Romeo to read it for him. Romeo saw that Rosaline (the girl he liked) was invited so he decided to go. This shows that education was a big factor because if the servant was had have been able to read, Romeo would not have gone to the party and met Juliet. Marriage was considered very important in those days. A woman would have no honour if she was not married. This is partly why a father would arrange his daughters marriage. Also, people did not get divorced in Verona because they were Catholic. Juliets arranged marriage was also in response to Tybalts death, her parents thought it would cheer her up and bring the family closer together in their time of grievance, we see this in Act III Scene v. Lady Capulet: Find thou means, and Ill find such a man But now Ill tell thee joyful tidings girl Well, well, thou hast a careful father, child, one who, to put thee from thy heaviness, hath sorted out a sudden day of joy If marriage was considered a bond between two people who love each other rather than just a womans ticket to honour, or, in this case, a quick fix for Juliets depression then Juliets marriage would not have been arranged and the families would have accepted Romeo and Juliets love, if the feud had not existed. People were extremely dedicated to religion (Christianity) at the time of Romeo and Juliet. It also plays a big part in Romeo and Juliets relationship. Juliet went to Friar Lawrence when her father told her to marry Paris. In Act II Scene v we see using shrift as an excuse whilst she went and married Romeo. Nurse: Have you leave to go to shrift today? Juliet: I have Nurse: Then hie you hence to Friar Lawrences cell, there stays a husband to make you a wife. Both Romeo and Juliet were close with Friar Lawrence; this is partly why he agreed to marry the pair because he thought it will patch relations between the feuding households. After marrying them, the Friar felt bound to keep them together, so when Romeo got banished and Juliet was supposed to marry Paris, he formulated a plan to bring Romeo and Juliet back together, but when the Friar attempted to send Romeo a letter it didnt get there because the person he had asked to deliver the letter couldnt get through a towns gate due to the outbreak of the plague at the time. This lead to trouble when Romeo found out that Juliet was dead (part of the Friars plan was to give her poison which made her seem dead for twenty four hours). Romeo went back to Verona and killed himself, then Juliet woke up to find Romeo dead she also killed herself. Several factors contributed to this particular part of the play, one being the plague. If people of the time had not been so religious, Romeo and Juliet would not have been so close with Friar Lawrence, then they may not have been able to get married in the first place. Romeo and Juliet felt it necessary to get married because they felt they were in love and their religion stated that they could not be together in a physical sense until they were married. .uc8c8d21784bce8e075c5e7ae178695ad , .uc8c8d21784bce8e075c5e7ae178695ad .postImageUrl , .uc8c8d21784bce8e075c5e7ae178695ad .centered-text-area { min-height: 80px; position: relative; } .uc8c8d21784bce8e075c5e7ae178695ad , .uc8c8d21784bce8e075c5e7ae178695ad:hover , .uc8c8d21784bce8e075c5e7ae178695ad:visited , .uc8c8d21784bce8e075c5e7ae178695ad:active { border:0!important; } .uc8c8d21784bce8e075c5e7ae178695ad .clearfix:after { content: ""; display: table; clear: both; } .uc8c8d21784bce8e075c5e7ae178695ad { display: block; transition: background-color 250ms; webkit-transition: background-color 250ms; width: 100%; opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #95A5A6; } .uc8c8d21784bce8e075c5e7ae178695ad:active , .uc8c8d21784bce8e075c5e7ae178695ad:hover { opacity: 1; transition: opacity 250ms; webkit-transition: opacity 250ms; background-color: #2C3E50; } .uc8c8d21784bce8e075c5e7ae178695ad .centered-text-area { width: 100%; position: relative ; } .uc8c8d21784bce8e075c5e7ae178695ad .ctaText { border-bottom: 0 solid #fff; color: #2980B9; font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; margin: 0; padding: 0; text-decoration: underline; } .uc8c8d21784bce8e075c5e7ae178695ad .postTitle { color: #FFFFFF; font-size: 16px; font-weight: 600; margin: 0; padding: 0; width: 100%; } .uc8c8d21784bce8e075c5e7ae178695ad .ctaButton { background-color: #7F8C8D!important; color: #2980B9; border: none; border-radius: 3px; box-shadow: none; font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; line-height: 26px; moz-border-radius: 3px; text-align: center; text-decoration: none; text-shadow: none; width: 80px; min-height: 80px; background: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/plugins/intelly-related-posts/assets/images/simple-arrow.png)no-repeat; position: absolute; right: 0; top: 0; } .uc8c8d21784bce8e075c5e7ae178695ad:hover .ctaButton { background-color: #34495E!important; } .uc8c8d21784bce8e075c5e7ae178695ad .centered-text { display: table; height: 80px; padding-left : 18px; top: 0; } .uc8c8d21784bce8e075c5e7ae178695ad .uc8c8d21784bce8e075c5e7ae178695ad-content { display: table-cell; margin: 0; padding: 0; padding-right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-align: middle; width: 100%; } .uc8c8d21784bce8e075c5e7ae178695ad:after { content: ""; display: block; clear: both; } READ: Compare and contrast the actions EssayWhen Romeo first saw Juliet he was drawn to her beauty. The two of them fell in love very quickly because they were teenagers and they felt so deeply in love that they needed to get married. When Romeo first explained this to Friar Lawrence in Act II Scene iii the Friar accuses Romeo of just being in love with Juliets beauty, Young mens love lies Not truly in their hearts, but in their eyes. He also said Wisely and slow, they stumble that run fast. This means that people who rush into things eventually fall. Romeo and Juliet could not understand the Friars point because they thought their love would always last, which emphasises even f urther their young naivety. Perhaps if Romeo and Juliet were older they would not have been so hasty with their relationship and things would not have gotten so serious so quickly. Also if the Friar had refused to marry them things would have been a lot different. Many factors that contribute to the tragedy of Romeo and Juliet were purely fate and chance, circumstances beyond our control. We observe several characters speaking of unhappy tidings and they refer to fate and chance. In Act V Scene ii when Friar Lawrence and Friar John talk about the letter, Friar Lawrence says Unhappy fortune! An Elizabethan audience would have taken more notice of this because they believed in fate a lot more than todays audience. Conclusion There were many issues to do with the society and values of the time that stood between Romeo and Juliet, but some of them brought them together. The society and values contributed to the outcome of the play to a great extent, but fate and chance was the catalyst that created the tragic outcome. I think that if it wasnt for the simple bad luck, Romeo and Juliet could have been together. The Elizabethan audience would have seen it like this because they had first hand experience of the society and values of the time. The modern audience has a much narrower understanding of all the things affecting Romeo and Juliet. But the Elizabethan audience would have had less sympathy with Romeo and Juliet than a modern audience because they would look down on people going against the major factors of their society as Romeo and Juliet did. They didnt feel that true love was of much importance.

School is Bad for Children Essay Example

School is Bad for Children Paper Is School Bad for Children? John Holt Education has always been an intense topic of discussion among many cultures and different groups of people. For many years it was believed that without formal structured education, academic success couldnt be achieved. Today that idea has been challenged and proved invalid by homeschooling, online classes and alternative learning of all sorts. In the article,†School is Bad for Children,† American author and educator John Holt talks about the failures and flaws within our traditional schooling system. In â€Å"School is Bad for Children†, Holt states that a child enters school with more willingness to learn and desire to figure things out for themselves than they will ever be at school. He says that children learn the most important thing they will ever need to know before they even go to school which is â€Å"the mystery of language†. That when you first go to school you want to be there and want to learn. Why Is School Bad? The author states that children do not learn own their own anymore, that their learning is done passively for them. Holt says that learning is separate from living and in other ways, he learns that he is abandoned and disloyal. Whatever you like or thinks important, its not. The only thing that matters is what the system wants and think is important. So the students learns not to ask questions and given no chances, he soon acknowleges the adults sterio-type of him. Children realize when at school, to be wrong or unsure is not adequate. The school only desires the correct answers and the student has to accomplish ways to â€Å"pry the answers out of the teacher.† Holt states that children are taught not to learn from each other, to ignore other students and to focus only on the teacher. Another controversial part of this essay by Holt is that he states that children learn from school how to shut their brains off, and that eventually leads them to drug use. Then Holt gets so bold as to suggest to abolish mandatory school attendance because that would cause the children not to be forced to go to school but to want to go to school. Furthermore, he offers many strategies to fix the school problem, including: remove children from schools and bring them out to the real world, take them to meet adults besides their parents and teaches, let children work together, and let children grade themselves. His final suggestion is to abolish curriculum altogether. We will write a custom essay sample on School is Bad for Children specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on School is Bad for Children specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on School is Bad for Children specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer In a nutshell, Holt argues boldly that the way our current educational system works is not best for children or their learning process. In the article Holt points out the specific flaws in modern education. He also offers alternative ideas for educating our youth. Through examples John Holt expresses the idea that children are much better learners without any formal teaching, before they ever set foot in a classroom. John Holt makes the statement, almost every child on the first day he sets foot in school is smarter, more curious, less afraid of what he doesn’t know, better at figuring things out, more confidant, resourceful, persistent, and independent than he or she will ever be again in school. Holt explains that without any formal education, by experimenting all alone, the child has done a task far more complicated and abstract than anything he will be taught. The child discovers and learns to use language independently. Holt goes further to argue that traditional schoolsà ¢â‚¬â„¢ impersonal and dull approach teaches the child that his or her experience, hopes, fears likes dislikes and opinions count for nothing. School tells our children that he only way they are capable of learning is by being properly taught from a teacher, and that without formal instruction; he doesn’t have the ability to figure things out and find answers on his own. The child learns not to ask questions, the author says, because only right answers are sought and Continue Reading